In a recent Chinese Super League match, Beijing Guoan's game against Chongqing Tonglianglong drew attention from the referee review committee. The Chinese Football Association's referee committee pointed out that there were errors in VAR intervention that affected the match outcome. During the match, Beijing Guoan's number 29 player fell in the opponent's penalty area, and the referee did not award a penalty. After VAR intervention, the referee maintained the no-call decision. The review committee concluded that this decision was correct, as the contact between players was deemed normal for the game. Additionally, in the 34th minute, Beijing Guoan scored a goal, which the referee ruled valid without VAR intervention. Chongqing Tonglianglong protested this decision, claiming the goal should be disallowed, but the review committee upheld the referee's decision as correct. Finally, in the 85th minute, Beijing Guoan scored again, and the referee ruled this goal valid as well, without VAR intervention. Chongqing Tonglianglong also contested this decision, citing a foul, but the review committee found no issues with the ruling. Overall, Beijing Guoan's performance in this match sparked widespread discussion regarding referee evaluations, with VAR usage and officiating decisions remaining a focal point.